Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1

Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 how to#
Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 full#
Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 pro#
Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 software#
Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 code#

I'm currently using MLAB cells as FIFO storage, which are rated for 290 MHz.īoth FIFOs are asynchronous and have a synchronizaton setting of 3. Soc_system:u0|CamConnector:camconnector_0|fifo_wdata_289 Soc_system:u0|CamConnector:camconnector_0|FIFO_289:FIFO_inst_289|dcfifo:dcfifo_component|dcfifo_6up1:auto_generated|wrptr_g The TimeQuest failing paths look mostly like this: Is there any other way I can make sure the timing requirement is met, or is there a better way to program this statemachine?įifo_wdata_289 = maxImgSize - 32 ' d2)//image done, transmit data and fire irqĮlse if(fifo_wdata_289)//process transfer without irq //258 high means that 256 has been written in this cycle and 258 in the previous cycle

Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 how to#

My question now is how to solve this problem, since I only have one layer of combinational logic (Demuxer and routing, as suggested by the assignment) and thus have no idea how to reduce that. The 288 MHz clock is generated via PLL and I'm using Timeconstraint files (sdc) with commands derive_pll_clocks and derive_clock_uncertainty. The recommendation of TimeQuest is to Reduce the levels of combinational logic for the path (Issue Long Combinational Path) with Extra levels of combinational logic = 1, which you could get a perfect reference here Discussion on the influencing factors of clock in FPGA design.

Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 code#

The Verilog code pasted below produces a timing problem, namely the assignment fifo_wdata_289 3.47 ns), and makes TimeQuest complain, that the constraints are being violated. I'm currently trying to implement an IP-Core on a Cyclone V 5CSEBA6U23I7 FPGA-HPS System using Altera Quartus II and TimeQuest Analyzer. Small team - not expecting to explode (4-8) any time soon. If shared, then clear to see what database changes. (Except for the dev that always has to have their own stuff, good forbid they actual do work then mess around reinventing the database schema every week)

Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 software#

The small form factor of the NUC seems nice to hide away near the developers.Īs to running sql server of each of our own system? Most of the work is on the software side, not database schema changes, so I have not seen any need to have individual instances.

Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 full#

Potentially could use one of the full rack servers that we phasing out, but in comparison thats cpu 5+ years old (4 cores 2.2ghz). Mostly for running a sql server (dev), with iis.Ĭontinues integration not needed (VSTS), but the RAM and cpu offload is the main things. Some of the intel NUC stuff seems good for the price NUC7I5BNK £335 (gbp) Intel Nuc Slim Baby Canyon NUC7I5BNK Core I5- 7260U Barebone | Used some old kit in the past, core 2 some 8+ years old 4gb ram, and decided to look up what some small form factor PCs were like now. Was wondering if anyone used a NUC or similar small factor desktop to run as a shared resource server for a software development group?īeen running a vm off my computer, and ram (plus all the other stuff i do) is well past the point i should have moved of the database. I guess it falls under nonsensical - why would you want to take something so fast (4GB/sec) and use it in a slower interface (SATA)?Īnyway, if any of you out there on an off chance know of a solution, I'm all ears. I wanted one of these: : QNINE M.2 Adapter to 2.5 SATA Enclosure, B & M Key SATA Based NGFF SSD Converter to 2.5 Inch SATA 3.0 Card Support 2230 2242 2260 2280 Hard Drive with 7mm Case: Computers & Accessoriesīut note the text in the listing: 'Friendly Reminder: DOES NOT SUPPORT M.2 PCI-E SSD.' After searching online for a week, and reading countless other requests for a product like this, I'm about to conclude that it just doesn't exist. So, I thought it would be trivial to find a USB to M key ssd adapter chassis to allow me to drop it into my cloner.

All I need to do is drop two SATA drives into it, and push a button.

My backup preference is to clone drives (I have a device to do this - it's SATA based).

Type2 Board Vendor Name 1 Type2 Board Product Name1 pro#

The laptop make matched the motherboard to a very decent ssd: Samsung 960 Pro 512GB MLC NAND M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 Internal Solid State Drive'. My laptop is one of the faster ones and uses a 4x PCIe based SSD, M key.